Comments on: The Invisible Pink Unicorn

By: Old Ironbark

Old Ironbark — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:03:58 +0000

The IPU sees all you do, hears all you say, likes pizza too.

By: Krishahl

Krishahl — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:02:41 +0000

That’s what I meant by ‘good work.’ I meant good movies, not preaching ,which can be and is forgiven.

By: Krishahl

Krishahl — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:57:52 +0000

I forgot to mention that, agenda aside, I enjoyed the video. It was funny.

Lol, “Charley….”

By: Krishahl

Krishahl — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 06:55:40 +0000

But… if he’s all powerful, can’t he write with hooves? Or at least make himself have hands?

Lol, Scientology satire….

Arguments aside, I am a person of faith as well. what faith that is matters not. Keep up the good work!

By: ServiusTheDruid

ServiusTheDruid — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:22:32 +0000

To be completely fair, the man in the funny hat also contradicts himself. He argues that the existence of the life forms on the crystal needs to be explained, and yet does not explain how the Pink Unicorn came into being.

Sort of like Genesis, actually.

“In the Beginning, God…”

We are never given this character’s backstory. We are just to take it on faith that this being, existence unexplained, appeared, and created our world.

While I do not disagree that Science also has no true approach to this, any scientist who tells you he knows how the Earth came into being is lying to you, Religion also has a similarly great hole.

It all comes down to whether you take on faith that an omnipotent, omnipresent, and rather dubiously-motivated deity decided to create our Earth in 7 days, and set us up for years to come…

OR whether you believe that atoms falling through the void uniformly and in a straight line HAPPENED to swerve, thus causing a fluke explosion, and bringing matter into where there was nothing.

My personal answer? I don’t, and cannot, know for sure. Until they perfect the LHC, or until God Almighty comes down and tells me, I do not think I can be qualified to answer this question.

I guess it’s all a matter of right brain/left brain. Would you be more inclined to trust a really great, and well-written story, or a set of hypothesis, untestable, and mainly assumed? None are necessarily the right, or wrong, way.

By: Kiirar

Kiirar — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:28:22 +0000

I must say, I’m not entirely thrilled with the thinley veiled agenda this movie clearly has. Machinima is a poor medium for it, and I find myself agreeing with the engineers more than the ‘sympathetic’ main character. It also shows a complete misunderstanding of the arguments you presume to mock, and the semantics and jargon used. Unforgivable.

By: ogarn

ogarn — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:23:10 +0000

As absurd as Religion itself

By: Deadhoof

Deadhoof — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:07:49 +0000

lol the first life form are SPORE creatures

By: Therawyn

Therawyn — Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:14:44 +0000

I strongly agree. Your videos are awesome, but the audio bloopers are my favorite part

By: kk7sm

kk7sm — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:16:11 +0000

Not really. He expects the “wise engineer” to respect his religious beliefs and makes the point that the “wise engineer” states a pink unicorn is ludicrous while having an equally ludicrous position involving space aliens and flying crystals. Ultimately, he does not expect the wise engineer to believe, but to merely respect his position. There is a world of difference between wanting a belief to be respected and to try to convert someone to a way of thinking.

I can’t eat ham and pineapple pizza because I’m allergic to pork!